Appeals court declines to rule if Trump was acting in official capacity when he allegedly defamed E. Jean Carroll

An appeals court has declined to answer whether then-President Trump was acting within the scope of his employment when he allegedly defamed E. Jean Carroll in 2019.

The D.C. Court of Appeals has declined to answer whether then-President Donald Trump was acting within the scope of his employment when he allegedly defamed writer E Jean Carroll when denying her rape claim.

Carroll sued Trump for defamation over statements he made in 2019 when he denied her claim that he raped her in the dressing room of Bergdorf Goodman in the 1990s.

MORE: E. Jean Carroll's defamation trial against Trump indefinitely delayed

Trump, who also denies defaming her, has argued that the Justice Department should be substituted as the defendant in the case because, at the time of his allegedly defamatory statements, he was acting in his official capacity as an employee of the federal government. Such a ruling would make the case go away, as the federal government cannot be sued for defamation.

On Thursday the D.C. Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over federal employees, returned the question to federal court in New York, where Carroll brought the suit.

"We have never adopted a rule that has determined that a certain type of conduct is per se within (or outside of) the scope of employment, and we decline to do so now," the court said.

PHOTO: E. Jean Carroll in New York, June 23, 2019.
E. Jean Carroll in New York, June 23, 2019.
Craig Ruttle/AP, FILE

The opinion leaves in limbo whether the case can go forward, but Carroll filed a second lawsuit in November alleging defamation and battery that is scheduled for trial April 25.

Trump has sought to delay that trial for four weeks, arguing a "cooling off" period was necessary given the publicity around Trump's recent criminal indictment on charges of falsifying business records. Carroll has opposed a delay.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who is Arthur Engoron? Judge weighing future of Donald Trump empire is Ivy League-educated ex-cabbie

The judge deciding the future of former President Donald Trump’s real estate empire has driven a taxi cab, played in a band and protested the Vietnam War NEW YORK -- He’s driven a taxi cab, played in a band and protested the Vietnam War. As a New York City judge, Arthur Engoron has resolved hundreds of disputes, deciding everything from zoning and free speech issues to a custody fight over a dog named “Stevie.” Now, in the twilight of a distinguished two-decade career on the bench, the erudite, Ivy League-educated judge is presiding over his biggest case yet: deciding the future of former President Donald Trump's real estate empire . Last week, Engoron ruled that Trump committed years of fraud by exaggerating his wealth and the value of assets on financial statements he used to get loans and make deals. As punishment, the judge said he would dissolve some of Trump's companies — a decision that could cause him to lose control of marquee New York properties, like Trump Tower. S...
Read more

Alexei Navalny’s Death Prompts Serious Questions as Biden Says Putin Is ‘Responsible’

J ailed Russian opposition leader and President Vladimir Putin critic Alexei Navalny, 47, has died in prison, the Office of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia said in a statement Friday.  "On Feb. 16, 2024, in correctional colony No 3, convict A A Navalny felt unwell after a walk, almost immediately losing consciousness," Sky News’ English translation of the Russian statement read.  "The institution's medical workers immediately arrived and an emergency medical team was called. All necessary resuscitation measures were carried out, but they did not yield positive results. Emergency medical doctors confirmed the death of the convict.”  The prison service said in a statement posted on its website later Friday that staff were sent to the institution following Navalny’s “sudden death.” TIME reached out to the press department of the Russian government, the prison service, and the foreign ministry for further information.  Navalny’s spokesperson Kira Yarmysh state...
Read more

Couple killed at their Florida senior living community, person of interest in custody

Image
Darryl Getman, 83, and Sharon Getman, 80, were "enjoying their golden years of retirement" when they were murdered, police in Florida said. A husband and wife in their 80s were murdered in their home at a Florida retirement community in what the police called a "random crime," and a female person of interest is now in custody. Darryl Getman, 83, and Sharon Getman, 80, were "enjoying their golden years of retirement" at Waterman Village in Mount Dora, Mount Dora Interim Police Chief Mike Gibson said at a news conference Tuesday. But "the golden years of Darryl and Sharon were tragically cut short by a ruthless and senseless double homicide," he said. Gibson was choked up as he told reporters, "I retired once. I think about those golden years. So this, I do take this person al." On Dec. 31, a concerned neighbor saw the Getmans' garage door open and called security, according to police. Security responded and found the couple dead. Und...
Read more